Cinemaniac Reviews

Give five minutes. Save two hours.

Archive for the category “War”

Kundun

Review No. 493

The Dalai Lama is important, but this movie believes otherwise.

MPW-37758

C

DIRECTED BY MARTIN SCORSESE. PRODUCED BY BARBARA DE FINA.  WRITTEN BY MELISSA MATHISON. DALAI LAMA PORTRAYED BY TENZIN THUTHOB TSARONG (ADULT), GYURME TETHONG (AGE 12), TULKU JAMYANG KUNGA TENZIN (AGE 5), AND TENZIN YESHI PAICHANG (AGE 2). ALSO STARRING TENCHO GYALPO, TENZIN TOPJAR, TSEWANG MIGYUR KHANGSAR, TENZIN LODOE, TSERING LHAMO, GESHI YESHI GYATSO, LOBSANG GYATSO, SONAM PHUNTSOK, GYATSO LUKHANG, LOBSANG SAMTEN, TSEWANG JIGME TSARONG, TENZIN TRINLEY, ROBERT LIN, JURME WANGDA, AND JILL HSIA. DISTRIBUTED BY BUENA VISTA PICTURES ON DECEMBER 25, 1997. PRODUCED IN ENGLISH BY THE UNITED STATES. RUNS 2 HOURS, 14 MINUTES. RATED PG-13 BY THE MPAA, FOR VIOLENT IMAGES.

KUNDUN WAS WATCHED ON JUNE 5, 2013.

“Sleep is the best meditation.” –Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama

Martin Scorsese can shock you with a good movie. His oeuvre is composed mainly of films you expect to be outstanding, and they turn out even better. He can shock you even more with something as simple as a good scene. The climactic moments of Goodfellas, for example. His biggest shocks, though, are when he makes a movie that’s less-than-tolerable. It rarely happens, but when does it happen, the lack of effort leaves you speechless with disappointment. He first did this in 1972 with Boxcar Bertha. Granted, that wasn’t exactly his film. It was a crime flick that he directed, but it had B-movie trash producer Roger Corman written all over it.

A movie like Kundun is especially disappointing because it’s something Scorsese typically does better than any director. Scorsese is one of very few who uses his creative license wisely when he goes to work on a biopic. He makes the characters his own by, first, telling about what they accomplished and, more importantly, making us really care about them. We just don’t care about a man who’s made to seem perfect. That’s why we have the psychotic boxer Jake LaMotta (Raging Bull), not the champion boxer Jake LaMotta; and why we have the Howard Hughes who became an entrepreneur because he was a control freak (The Aviator), not the Howard Hughes who was just an entrepreneur.

Behold!  His Holiness, the 14th Dalai Lama, hath come to bore us all to tears!

Behold! His Holiness, the 14th Dalai Lama, hath come to bore us all to tears!

If directing is defined as standing somewhere among the crew members during production, while he decides what to have for dinner, then Scorsese did indeed direct Kundun. The movie has the entire “flawed character” motif down. Written by Melissa Mathison and doctored by the film’s subject himself, the screenplay offers the Fourteenth Dalai Lama as a character we should care about. But we don’t. The lack of care is obvious in the first ten minutes of the film. It’s the sort of sequence you can tell was in the screenplay, but as Scorsese (for whatever reason) doesn’t seem to care about the character, he calls the shots based on an interpretation that we shouldn’t care either.

The scene features a servant of the recently-deceased Thirteenth Dalai Lama finding two-year-old Tenzin Gyatso in his home and, after meeting him, proclaiming that he must become the Fourteenth Dalai Lama when he comes of age; he visits seven years later to consult Gyatso once more. The reason this scene isn’t moving is because it’s not taken solemnly. The ultimate presentation of these ten minutes is basically identical, but emotionally, it’s somewhere between bizarrely unrealistic and unintentionally funny. We have what appears to be a strange, desperate man, walking into a Tibetan household; noticing a child of nine and his obsession with having power, as is natural for an arrogant nine-year-old; and telling him that he will be whisked away so that in six years, he can rule an entire nation. It’s like watching a random passerby walk into an orphanage and ask Oliver Twist if he wants to become the Prime Minister of England. He probably does, but at his innocent, uninformed age, what does he know about the responsibilities?

Kundun isn’t a bad movie, but it would take significant generosity to call it a good one. Editing, music, and cinematography make the historical account look like the work of David Lean. Perhaps Lean would have gotten his hands on it first, if only he hadn’t passed away six years prior; the essential difference between Kundun and The Bridge on the River Kwai is that the latter has a present meaning. Again, the writing clearly did offer some emotion, but only a crumb of it managed its way to the screen. We learn how arrogance led servants to patronize the 14th Dalai Lama much more than honor him. Even here, you kind of question whether or not he deserved to be patronized. We learn some of his responsibilities a bit later in the film, as far as leading a nation is concerned. I wish I could tell you what some of these duties were, but my mind–like Scorsese’s–was much more concerned with what to have for dinner.

NOTE: The film does not feature a single A-list actor, not even from around the region. The cast here does have interesting stories, though. Tenzin Thuthob Tsarong, who portrayed the 14th adult Dalai Lama, is the grandson of the 14th himself. Lobsang Samten, who portrayed the master of the kitchen, is–according to Wikipedia–”an American Tibetan scholar, sand mandala artist, former Buddhist monk, and Spiritual Director of the Tibeta Buddhist Center of Philadelphia.” The stories go on for about 90% of the cast. All very interesting, but just a year’s worth of acting lessons could have helped, too.

Obstruction #1

Enjoy my review? Please share it using one of the buttons below!

The Hurt Locker

Review No. 472

Good, but “Hurt” oh so badly by its script.

20130504-211132.jpg

B-MINUS

DIRECTED BY KATHRYN BIGELOW. WRITTEN BY MARK BOAL. STARRING JEREMY RENNER (SERGEANT FIRST CLASS WILLIAM JAMES), ANTHONY MACKIE (SERGEANT J. T. SANBORN), BRIAN GERAGHTY (SPECIALIST OWEN ELDRIDGE), CHRISTIAN CAMARGO (LIEUTENANT COLONEL JOHN CAMBRIDGE), EVANGELINE LILLY (CONNIE JAMES), RALPH FIENNES (THE LEADER OF A PRIVATE MILITARY COMPANY UNIT), DAVID MORSE (COLONEL REED), AND GUY PEARCE (STAFF SERGEANT MATTHEW THOMPSON). ALSO STARRING CHRISTOPHER SAYEGH. DISTRIBUTED BY SUMMIT ENTERTAINMENT AND UNIVERSAL STUDIOS ON JUNE 26, 2009. PRODUCED IN ENGLISH BY THE UNITED STATES. RUNS 2 HOURS, 11 MINUTES. RATED R BY THE MPAA, FOR WAR VIOLENCE AND LANGUAGE.

THE HURT LOCKER WAS WATCHED ON MAY 4, 2013.

“The rush of battle is often a potent and lethal addiction, for war is a drug.” –Chris Hedges

The Hurt Locker runs two hours, eleven minutes, and everything from “go” feels like the middle section of a war epic. We open not knowing who these characters are at all, other than U.S. soldiers who have been ordered to Iraq during the War on Terror. We begin with action, and we end with action; certain moments in between are spent developing characters beyond their dialogue. Do I sound like I’m reviewing a James Cameron flick? It’s possible his ex-wife, Kathryn Bigelow, stole a few stylistic ideas while creating this.

But why would she steal from her ex-husband when she so obviously loves this project as something of her very own? The Hurt Locker keeps, reportedly, over 100 times less than what was shot. That’s well over two-hundred hours of different angles, powerful acting, and just two key editors to extract the best of the best, and thus piece it into something just over two hours. The statistic is mind-blowing, and onscreen, it looks great. The dramatization represents a realistic view of war by showing the humanity of every actor, the several hundred points of view, the rigid camera, and the sudden tense feeling we draw in the climactic moments (even if the catharsis is entirely predictable).

But in every man’s interpretation of real life, there is boredom. The Hurt Locker offers a lot of it. As previously suggested, Mark Boal’s writing is sparsely more than a flat line. It’s often mind-numbing, going in clueless to an uneven, tediously paced cluster of characters and action alike. And I liked these characters. I would’ve taken a four-hour movie in a heartbeat, just so long as there was a solid beginning and end to surround the two hours we HAVE seen.

You all know I love puns–the awfuller the better. Here’s a few puns and a half for you, per the plot itself: Some scenes in The Hurt Locker were rather explosive, but by now, they’ve long since diffused in my memory. I wouldn’t say The Hurt Locker was the bomb. I wouldn’t say it bombed, either. To try and guess why this won Best Picture, however, might cause my mind to explode.

TOMORROW, ON CINEMANIAC REVIEWS…

The Evil Dead

Saving Private Ryan

Review No. 466

Deeply poignant.

saving_private_ryan_ver2

A

DIRECTED BY STEVEN SPIELBERG. WRITTEN BY ROBERT RODAT. STARRING TOM HANKS (CAPTAIN JOHN H. MILLER), EDWARD BURNS (PRIVATE FIRST CLASS RICHARD REIBEN), MATT DAMON (PRIVATE FIRST CLASS JAMES FRANCIS RYAN), AND TOM SIZEMORE (TECHNICAL SERGEANT MIKE HORVATH). ALSO STARRING ADAM GOLDBERG, BARRY PEPPER, BRYAN CRANSTON, DALE DYE, DEMETRI GORITSAS, DENNIS FARINA, GIOVANNI RIBISI, HARRISON YOUNG, HARVE PRESNELL, JEREMY DAVIES, JOERG STADLER, KATHLEEN BYRON, LELAND ORSER, MAX MARTINI, NATHAN FILLION, PAUL GIAMATTI, TED DANSON, AND VIN DIESEL. DISTRIBUTED BY DREAMWORKS ON JULY 24, 1998. PRODUCED IN ENGLISH BY THE UNITED STATES. RUNS 2 HOURS, 49 MINUTES. RATED R BY THE MPAA, FOR INTENSE PROLONGED REALISTICALLY GRAPHIC SEQUENCES OF WAR VIOLENCE, AND FOR LANGUAGE.

SAVING PRIVATE RYAN WAS WATCHED ON APRIL 26, 2013.

“Like finding a needle in a stack of needles.” –Captain John H. Miller (Tom Hanks)

Saving Private Ryan is director Steven Spielberg’s followup to 1993′s Schindler’s List. Both are epic dramas that present the tragedies of war, specifically major traumas during World War II. The prior film scoped in on Oskar Schindler, a man who would do anything to liberate the Jews during the Holocaust; he gave his fortune away to the cause and died without a penny of it ever returned to him. Saving Private Ryan, however, wants to differentiate between its hero and its protagonist–two completely different characters.

The film opens with a flashback to June 6, 1944–D-Day, when the beaches at Normandy were stormed. The sequence is an extensive massacre that exceeds twenty minutes, and we are introduced early on to Captain John H. Miller. It’s fitting that he doesn’t stand out, and Tom Hanks–a man who can’t help but stand out in his most minor roles–does an awful good job of tackling the character. It’s representative of later scenes, where we learn his character is only a primary focus. He’s assigned the mission to bring home Private James Francis Ryan (Matt Damon), whose brothers were all killed in action, but all the reason he can gather for completing this task is that he himself can only go home if Private Ryan is home.

Saving Private Ryan is well written. Occasionally, a deus ex machina moment will excuse itself as a plot point, but discount these rarities and the film is a flawless, astonishingly realistic masterpiece. Most of the director’s canon has consisted of works inspired by his childhood. Saving Private Ryan is a clear exception, but it’s difficult to deny the genius that transfers through from his conformities. From films such as Close Encounters of the Third Kind and Jurassic Park, it’s rather obvious that Steven Spielberg is a true genius in technical style. Spielberg’s second-in-command here is none other than his cinematographer, Janusz Kaminski, who has photographed every film of his since the early 1990s. The film, therefore, has the power to be absolutely gorgeous when it wants to, or harshly brutal–”shaky cam” and all–during the rather grotesque combat sequences. Let’s not forget John Williams’s score, or the unique approach to sound mixing.

All this only builds up on the authentic effect of the film. On one note, that’s horrifying, but once you’ve entered the near-three-hour epic, the only way out is to finish.

TOMORROW, ON CINEMANIAC REVIEWS…

The Intouchables (@2:00); Amour (@4:30)

Reds

Review No. 447

It bleeds power.

4lnkeEJP4XDjwtirkjs27q3AR1z

Directed by: Warren Beatty
Screenplay by: Warren Beatty and Trevor Griffiths
John Reed: Warren Beatty
Louise Bryant: Diane Keaton
Eugene O’Neill: Jack Nicholson
Louis C. Fraina: Paul Sorvino
Emma Goldman: Maureen Stapleton
Pete Van Wherry: Gene Hackman
Max Eastman: Edward Herrmann
Also Starring: Bessie Love, Ian Wolfe, Jerzy Kosinski, Max Wright, M. Emmet Walsh, Nicolas Coster, William Daniels

Distributed by Distributed by Paramount Pictures on December 4, 1981. Produced in English, Russian, and German by the United States. Runs 194 mins. Rated PG by the MPAA–mature themes, violence, language.

Reds was watched on March 5, 2013.

“Economic freedom for women means sexual freedom, and sexual freedom means birth control…” –John Reed (Warren Beatty)

Reds centers on two Americans: Jack Reed (Warren Beatty), a government associate dealing with foreign affairs, and Louise Bryant (Diane Keaton), a journalist and a protofeminist advocating women’s rights. This seems like the best/worst couple for a movie that begins in 1915-1920, but the focus is not on political matters.

The drama focuses on how the couple’s separate causes brought them together, tore them apart, brought them back together, and tore them back apart. Reds is a movie that realizes several connections between love and war. Considering these are the two most accessible topics in any time period, the film masquerades in authenticity.

Diane Keaton’s starring earn is the role of a lifetime. Now I’ve seen her onscreen several times–usually in either Woody Allen movies or recent throwaway comedies–and I never would have imagined her as the lead in a sweeping, historical romance epic. I’ll say my mind has been blown in an intense sense of the word. Warren Beatty gave a performance at least half as dynamic as Keaton’s. Consider this, of course, a huge compliment, especially since the man directed, produced, and co-wrote Reds as well.

Reds features several interview segments. It’s certainly a nice addition, but frankly, the film captured everything that an interview could and could not capture. We get a bona fide glimpse at the “Red scare” as well as at the rickety relationship between Jack Reed and Louise Bryant. I’m not saying the third-party interviews were unnecessary though; they are, in fact, a large step further into the “you are there” feeling that the film so powerfully fortified.

A PLUS

TOMORROW, ON CINEMANIAC REVIEWS...

TOMORROW, ON CINEMANIAC REVIEWS…

 

Oz the Great and Powerful

Zero Dark Thirty

Review No. 396

Print

The Bottom Line: Two and a half hours of a cold sweat.

Directed by: Kathryn Bigelow
Written by: Mark Boal
Maya: Jessica Chastain
Also Starring: Jason Clarke, Joel Edgerton

Distributed by Columbia Pictures on December 19, 2012. Produced in English by the United States. Runs 157 mins. Rated R by the MPAA for strong violence including brutal disturbing images, and for language.

Zero Dark Thirty was watched on January 21, 2013.

“You lie to me. I hurt you.” –Dan (Jason Clarke)

Zero Dark Thirty is a near-decade long chronicle of the killing of Ussama bin Laden. The drama commences on September 11, 2001, the tragic day on which bin Laden ordered suicide bombers to attack multiple cities in the USA; the conclusion marks the death of bin Laden on May 1, 2011, at zero dark thirty. That’s CIA jargon for “half past midnight.”

The years in between were filled with harrowing, unending struggle for those at the US Embassy in Pakistan. No one knew bin Laden’s whereabouts. It was next to impossible to discern when al-Qaeda terrorists were actually giving truthful information about where their leader could be found. And on top of it all, the woman who is in charge of the mission is constantly doubted by her fellow agents.

Women's.  Rights.

Women’s. Rights.

To retell such a detailed story in a short two and a half hours is a dangerous commitment. There’s much detail that composes this account. As far as what is crucially important, what should be approached with a slightly fictional twist, and what should be ultimately expended, writing this into a script would kill just as much sleep as did the mission itself.

Mark Boal nails it, though. 00:30 is not a didactic recollection; save for the final shots, it is not a slow, emotional drama, either. The thriller entertains mostly from keeping a bit of action on the horizon, but delving headfirst into intrigue. This is especially true for the final half hour. Thanks to what history has informed us, we are already aware of how the film will come to a close.

Ironically, the scenes that lead up to this are by far the most exhilarating. We grow to care very deeply about the characters involved. Even the Navy SEALs, who don’t appear until minutes before the final mission, are given enough depth. Who was the one who killed bin Laden? How many of them lost their lives during the mission? These are just two of at least fifty questions that linger during these tense moments. Boal and director Kathryn Bigelow don’t leave room for surprise, they make room.

Jessica Chastain is the gears of everything that appears in front of the camera. She portrays Maya, the agent who won’t give up on meeting the objective that is has surrounded such a large chunk of her life, no matter who denies her outstanding intellect, no matter how bitchily she must assert herself. Through her eyes, 00:30 is a very meaningful story, one that thoroughly defines a strong female lead.

Although Chastain has done this before on several occasions (her most recent filmography consists of her either leading or co-leading Take Shelter, Coriolanus, The Debt, The Tree of Life, and The Help), watching her deliver is beyond moving. Around halfway through the film, she vociferates a powerful speech, at odds with an agent who would rather give up searching for bin Laden. The scene lasts no more than forty-five seconds, but it slaughters any question about who will win the Best Actress Oscar this February.

00:30 is an intensely visceral look behind the War on Terror, filled with depth and suspense. Think of it just as a manhunt thriller, except set against recent American history. Bigelow’s command is exorbitantly involving and beyond impressive. Again, the film isn’t meant to inform us about what we already know. Zero Dark Thirty seeks to entertain, and entertain it does.

Postscript: A brief note on the controversy the film has generated: a) It’s not “pro-Obama propaganda.” The President appears for no more than twenty seconds on a TV, and he earns no other mention. b) I’m not sure why there were accusations of the film crew using classified information. If that were true, there could have been a whole extra hour for “fleshing out,” and there wouldn’t be any ex-CIA agents noting the film as inaccurate. c) The opening scenes are filled with torture, but for one, the depiction isn’t nearly as brutal as what you might think; and for two, the focus is more on trying to find the truth about bin Laden’s whereabouts, as opposed to the act of torture itself.

A

WINNER
Best Actress (Jessica Chastain)

NOMINEE
Best Director (Kathryn Bigelow); Best Screenplay; Best Quote

Les Misérables

Review No. 378

les_miserables_ver3

The Bottom Line: Les Misérables is the most beautiful film of last year.

Directed by: Tom Hooper
Written by: William Nicholson
Based on: musical by Claude-Michel Schönberg; novel by Victor Hugo
Book by: Claude-Michel Schönberg and Alain Boublil
Original French lyrics by: Alain Boublil and Jean-Marc Natel
Translated English lyrics by: Herbert Kretzmer
Jean Valjean: Hugh Jackman
Javert: Russell Crowe
Fantine: Anne Hathaway
Cosette: Amanda Seyfried
Thénardier: Sacha Baron Cohen
Madame Thénardier: Helena Bonham Carter
Enjolras: Aaron Tveit
Éponine: Samantha Barks
Gavroche: Daniel Huttlestone

Distributed by Universal Pictures on December 25, 2012. Produced in English by the United Kingdom. Runs 160 minutes. Rated PG-13 by the MPAA for suggestive and sexual material, violence and thematic elements.

Les Misérables was watched on December 26, 2012.

“Do you hear the people sing?
Singing a song of angry men?
It is the music of a people
Who will not be slaves again!
When the beating of your heart
Echoes the beating of the drums
There is a life about to start
When tomorrow comes!”

If the moviemaking world were flowing with directors who could attain just what Tom Hooper has attained, Friday nights would be impressive, outstanding, and jaw-dropping displays of innovation and glory. Hooper has done something I cannot recall ever having been done when transforming a Broadway musical from stage to screen. I’m not saying that this the first, sung-through musical adaptation of Les Misérables that has ever been released to the silver screen. I speak of something far grander.

While filming, the actors and actresses all heard the orchestration as it was separately recorded, so that they may express dialogue in a less constricted manner, while still staying with the score. Basically, what is happening is singing sentences rather than musical phrases. This style allows boundless emotion through the dramatic aspects as well as the cinematic aspects.

She dreamed a dream.

The performances are indeed magnificent. What’s even better is that the cast has outstanding an outstanding voice (with the disappointingly noticeable exception of Russell Crowe). Fantine’s (Anne Hathaway) “I Dreamed a Dream” is particularly moving, as is Éponine’s (debuting Samantha Barks) “On My Own”.

Purely for the sake of beauty in speech, none of the cast flaunts a French accent, save for Helena Bonham Carter and Sacha Baron Cohen, the two nasty, drunken comic reliefs in an otherwise melancholy drama.

Australian actor Hugh Jackman delivers stunningly as Jean Valjean, the hero in this tour de force. Our story commences in 1815, sixteen years after the end of the French Revolution. Jean Valjean is now being released on parole by Inspector Javert, who had imprisoned him for nineteen years, merely for stealing bread to feed his family, and four righteous albeit failed escape attempts. During his time out of prison, and still at odds with Javert, Valjean breaks parole and utterly redeems himself. He becomes a factory worker as well as the mayor; he cares for and raises young Cosette, after her illegitimate mother dies and two self-absorbed innkeepers abuse her.

This is the story of one man’s (Valjean) risks to promote love over law; and another man’s (Javert) risks to promote law over love. This is a story of love itself, even if it means going as far as criminal acts, even if that means going as far as dying for loved ones. This is a story of redemption, even if there was no definitive injustice in the first place, even if there is a subtly religious overtone that embodies the entirety. This is a story of hope, even if the French Revolution ended up lasting an entire decade, and left a period of despair in its aftermath; even if the lower class never earned any money, let alone respect for their social status.

This is the adaptation of Claude-Michel Schönberg’s 1987 musical Les Misérables, eponymously based upon Victor Hugo’s extensive 1862 novel of the same name. How amazing that Hugo wrote that novel just years after the French Revolution, and as it appears precisely 150 years later, it’s perhaps just as authentic.

Of course, this screen edition runs long, but it doesn’t feel anywhere near the reported two hours, forty minutes.

Acting. Music. Screenplay. Direction. Costume. Cinematography. Makeup. Regardless of whether a minute aspect or a conversely forward one, these are all absolutely astonishing pieces that make the film as unforgettable as it is. In essence, Les Misérables is the paragon, sweeping musical epic.

A

WINNER
Best Director (Tom Hooper); Best Supporting Actress (Anne Hathaway)

NOMINEE
Best Picture; Best Actor (Hugh Jackman); Best Supporting Actor (Sacha Baron Cohen); Best Cinematography; Best Costume Design; Best Editing; Best Ensemble/All-Star Performance; Best Debut/Breakthrough Performance (Samantha Barks)

The Pianist

pianist

Bottom Line: A beautiful/disturbing serenade well worth watching.

Directed by: Roman Polanski
Władysław Szpilman: Adrien Brody
Also Starring: Ed Stoppard, Emilia Fox, Frank Finlay, Jessica Kate Meyer, Julia Rayner, Maureen Lipman, Michal Zebrowski, Nomi Sharron, Richard Ridings, Wanja Mues

“An engine, an engine
Chuffing me off like a Jew.
A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belsen.
I began to talk like a Jew.
I think I may well be a Jew.”
–”Daddy” by Sylvia Plath

We’ve heard it all too many times. “Never mention politics or religion, in polite conversation.” The two alone are likely to toss around reckless, harsh debate, but when combined, there is a grave, rather factual matter at hand. Proof: the Holocaust. You can joke all you want about religion, you can break politics down to its most absurd trivialities, but you can’t joke about something so horrifying. This has been set on film several times, namely by Louis Malle in Au revoir les enfants and by Steven Spielberg in Schindler’s List. You kind of have to expect Roman Polanski’s The Pianist to be just as gut-wrenching as his other pieces. Just like Chinatown and Rosemary’s Baby, it often comes as a surprise attack, particularly when using the onscreen genocide as a test of the audience’s inner strength. There’s something here that Polanski’s other films are lacking, however, and that is the story’s depth. We see the shoah through a singular man’s eyes, yet it’s sometimes more intricate than omniscient dramas.

Read more…

Lincoln

Bottom Line: Lincoln is easily Spielberg’s most unforgettable since Schindler’s List.

Directed by: Steven Spielberg
President Abraham Lincoln: Daniel Day-Lewis
Also Starring: David Strathairn, Hal Holbrook, Jackie Earle Haley, James Spader, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Sally Field, Tommy Lee Jones

“Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Section 2. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.” –The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Let us begin with a brief rundown. Abraham Lincoln was inaugurated sixteenth President of the USA in 1861. Although a long-time Whig, Lincoln was the first commander-in-chief to emerge from the Republican party. Prior to his 1865 assassination, Lincoln devoted much of his presidency to the abolition of slavery. Following his 1863 Emancipation Proclamation, he poured buckets of sweat over the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, the brief but rather incredible statement that would officially abolish the country’s slavery. Although these papers were not ultimately ratified until nearly eight months after Lincoln’s passing, we remember it as his legacy. And that’s the basics–none of which is present in Lincoln, or at least not in that superficial mentality. Even one who knew innately of Lincoln’s controversy during his truncated presidency would be mind-blown by how astoundingly this account depicts it. No, it isn’t a documentary, so there’s still a good chance that it was dramatized. Knowing the director, the writer, and the cast, however, it’s all for a purpose. A purpose that vastly succeeds at transforming generic textbook information into an enthralling tale of revolution and leadership.

Read more…

Act of Valor

Bottom Line: Act of Valor is better than you may have heard.

Directed by: Mike McCoy, Scott Waugh
The Navy SEALs: Admiral Callaghan, Captain Duncan Smith, Katelyn, LCDR Rorke, SO1 Ajay, SO1 Ray, SOC Dave, SOC Mikey, SOC Sonny, SOC Weimy, SOCS Billy, SOCS Van D

When Act of Valor was released this past February, it was panned by three in every four critics. It was not this but my own views on war that prompted me to ignore the film. As I could never imagine how horrific war is, I feel strongly that those who risk their lives for our country deserve the utmost amount of respect. Whereas war-centric dramas (Flags of Our Fathers, Schindler’s List) possess an automatic capability with conveying this insurmountable honor, I see absolutely no justification for transforming such events into a popcorn-ish action movie (Black Hawk Down, the recent Red Tails). I reconsidered Act of Valor, however, after chewing over what made the film a box office success in the first place: the vast majority of the cast is actual Navy SEALs, in a story based on true acts of valor. The film is an action thriller, but if twelve (let alone any) elites could weigh the script’s reverence successfully, who’s to say it isn’t worth watching?

Read more…

Pan’s Labyrinth

Bottom Line: Not a Grimm fairy tale–a grim fairy tale.

Directed by: Guillermo del Toro
Starring: Alex Angulo, Ariadna Gil, Cesar Vea, Doug Jones, Ivana Baquero, Ivan Massague, Manolo Solo, Maribel Verdu, Roger Casamajor, Sergi Lopez

Pan’s Labyrinth is a somberly spellbinding experience, just as brutally harrowing to our emotions as it is captivating to our spirits.  It’s a story rarely ever told, let alone so beautifully.  All right, there’s Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland and its umpteen adaptations.  Pan’s Labyrinth is quite comparable to that universally familiar story, but it goes without saying that this is no cheerful escapade, nor is it meant for young children.

Read more…

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 790 other followers

%d bloggers like this: