Cinemanic Reviews

OLD. NEW. GOOD. BAD. EVERYTHING.

Archive for the tag “1990”

Cinema Paradiso

Review No. 402

cinema_paradiso

The Bottom Line: Toto, I’m afraid we’re not in Kansas anymore.

Directed by: Giuseppe Tornatore
Screenplay by: Giuseppe Tornatore
Story by: Giuseppe Tornatore
Collaborating Writer: Vanna Paoli
Alfredo: Philippe Noiret
Toto (child): Salvatore Cascio
Toto (adolescent): Marco Leonardi
Toto (adult): Jacques Perrin
Also Starring: Agnese Nano, Antonella Attili, Enzo Cannavale, Giovanni Giancono, Isa Danieli, Leopoldo Trieste, Nino Terzo, Pupella Maggio

Distributed by Miramax Films in Italy on November 17, 1988; and in the United States on February 23, 1990. Produced in Italian, English, Portuguese, and Sicilian by Italy. International cut runs 124 mins. Original Italian cut runs 155 mins. Rated PG by the MPAA (mature themes).

Cinema Paradiso was watched on January 26, 2013.

“Life isn’t like in the movies. Life… is much harder.” –Alfredo (Philippe Noiret)

Many individuals have told me to watch foreign films dubbed, not subtitled, and although I hate dubbing for one major reason (take a guess), I can’t say the rationale is inaccurate. They say reading subtitles for two hours is like reading a book that you may or may not care for, while hearing a foreign language spoken in the background.

I just can’t seem to fathom that theory for Cinema Paradiso, though. The film is in Italian. I know five phrases in Italian: buongiorno, buonasera, si, no, and figlio di una cagna. But the film uses its language to speak a broader language, an unwritten one that amalgamates any extravagant appreciation for film.

Cinema Paradiso is a wonder to behold for virtually any human audience. For film aficionados, it’s a two-hour tour around every golden arch in heaven. The story is essentially focused on what it means to fall in love, what it means to live freely. Young Salvatore “Toto” Di Vita is only six years old when he finds his passion in film. A mischief, Sicilian schoolboy, he meets the aging Alfredo in a projection booth at the Cinema Paradiso (“Paradise Cinema”) and is mesmerized. Alfredo soon shows the skilled child around the booth and eventually allows him to run it in his spare time. But when Toto expresses his desire to be in the booth forever, hearing the audience’s laughs, cries, and cheers as he rolls celluloid, he is warned against it.

Cinema Paradiso commences only a few years after the end of World War II. One of the main issues throughout the first half of the movie is that at the time, film strips were entirely flammable. If one was cranking slowly enough, or the later-invented machinery ruptured, the film could quickly catch fire. I suppose it’s fascinating to think about today, in an era of (gosh) digital projection, but you feel much differently watching how it acts as a catalyst for the events in the second half.

During the entire first half, Toto is warned time and again of this knowledge. In the very beginning of the film, we see a Roman Catholic priest cutting every romantic scene in an unnamed movie for the sake of decency. When he is done his orders to the projection booth, Toto notices the wasted celluloid on the floor. He asks if he can keep it, and is told it’s a present, but it must stay in the projection booth, or it will catch fire. Only after sneaking it out does he learn that this was not a joke.

It’s telling that Toto could do nothing to stop the mid-film events from occurring. There is a very sudden change: One moment, nearly every citizen is gathered in the square to watch a film projected on the facade of the Cinema Paradiso. Up in a balcony are Alfredo and Toto, gleefully watching the movie. Suddenly, it catches fire, and within a split-second, Alfredo is insisting on rushing to the projection booth himself, fixing the projector himself. The sudden act of heroism confines him to terminal blindness, but he can somehow see with a “sixth sense,” knowing when a camera is off focus without hearing a bit of the audience’s reaction; undoubtedly, it’s a feeling from having been acquainted with the “career” for so long. After the Nuovo Cinema Paradiso (“New Paradise Cinema”) is opened where the ashes of the old development had formerly stood, there is no impairment in the friendship between Toto and Alfredo up in the projection booth, now run by the latter.

Describing Blasco Giurato’s spellbinding cinematography as much as needed is a lofty task, one that demands a separate review. There’s so much fragrant, effervescent beauty in the visual ilk, particularly in the closing shots. Cinema Paradiso manages to astound in its exquisite technical quality as much as with its vibrant story. The film’s sound is a masterwork by Ennio Morricone, the revered John Williams of Italy. The man began his work in 1961 and has orchestrated several hundred films and television series since. Of course, I haven’t heard all his mastery, but I always rank A Fistful of Dollars and The Untouchables among his best musically scored. Enter Cinema Paradiso and both those titles kneel in its grand, yet solemn, presence.

Cinema Paradiso is an unforgettable motion picture, singing the praises of going to the movies. It’s not a story about movies changed a life, so much as how it created one. The entire film is a flashback to a daydream that occurred to Toto, present-day. At this point, Toto has fulfilled at least 85% of his life. He is a renowned filmmaker living in Rome; he is living with the girl of his dreams; he has the same, absolutely perfect best friend that he had met three or four decades before. There’s more, but all of it, too, is because of his commitment to the Cinema Paradiso. Cinema Paradiso is a mesmerizing drama, powerfully mounted, yet soft spoken, humbled, and emotional to no end.

Postscript: There was also a director’s cut released in 2002, running 50 minutes longer than the international version, and 19 minutes longer than the Italian version.

A PLUS

Groundhog Day

Metropolitan

Review No. 389

MPW-40438

The Bottom Line: A ho-hum drama speckled rather thankfully with the wit of Whit Stillman.

Directed by: Whit Stillman
Written by: Whit Stillman
Audrey Rouget: Carolyn Farina
Tom Townsend: Edward Clements
Also Starring: Allison Parisi, Chris Eigeman, Dylan Hundley, Taylor Nichols

Distributed by New Line Cinema on August 3, 1990. Produced in English by the United States. Runs 98 minutes. Rated PG-13 by the MPAA (mature themes; infrequent sexual situations).

Metropolitan was watched on January 12, 2013.

“It’s an acronym for ‘urban haute bourgeoisie.’”

Whit Stillman began writing Metropolitan in 1984, while working a part-time job in New York, and didn’t finish until 1988. In order to finance the film, he committed to selling his apartment for $50,000, and spreading the word among family and friends who were willing to finance. The budget ultimately added up to a minimal $225,000.

It’s ironic that such an independent approach to filmmaking centers on those who could just as easily hire some to write the script, and shell the money right out of their pockets, all in less than a week. Our story is an interesting one, offering subtle humor we’re not used to. But when it tries to progress with a malnourished structure, it begins to fall apart.

Starting off, Metropolitan is a delight. The appreciation for humor of poor manner is quite welcome, especially when among the “rich snobs.” We’re almost invited into the lifestyle, with lively exaggeration, music, et al. This is of a style known as “comedy of manners,” featuring depictions of an all too outwardly wealthy lifestyle, and how it changes when encountered by a middle-class fellow.

Then the humor begins to fade. The film can’t rely on it completely. And so it reveals itself behind the mask, a drama with humor polka dotted in spontaneous patterns.

Metropolitan could have been great, had it stuck with its much-needed initial façade. There isn’t much to everything else about it, just a tale of several upper-class snobs competing perpetually to decide who can complain the most. They’re all hypocrites whose inability to discern what is politically correct makes them both well-developed and obnoxious.

I don’t see a problem with detestable characters with nothing agreeable or so much as rational to say. But when they populate the film so vastly, it’s a bit easy to forget about the shy protagonist who changes them all in the end.

Revisiting the polka dot analogy. Metropolitan features polka dots of comedy not just spontaneously, but colorfully and largely. It’s difficult to miss such moments of slyly crafted, brightly manipulated “Whit.” When juxtaposed with the rather bleak melodrama, they’re golden, just enough to justify a recommendation.

B MINUS

GoodFellas

Bottom Line: Goodfellas.  Wise guys.  Fantastic movie.

Directed by: Martin Scorsese
Starring: Chuck Low, Frank Sivero, Frank Vincent, Joe Pesci, Lorraine Bracco, Mike Starr, Paul Sorvino, Ray Liotta, Robert De Niro, Tony Darrow

“When I left you, I was but the learner, now I am the master.” –Darth Vader

The above quote applies directly with Martin Scorsese’s GoodFellas.  It’s as if the entire film bears a subliminal message to Francis Ford Coppola, one of Scorsese’s largest influences.  The film, at 2 hours and 26 minutes, delivers a story that is essentially the entire multi-decade Godfather chronology in a nutshell; Henry Hill is easily comparable to Michael Corleone, as is Karen Hill to Kay Adams and James Conway to Vito Corleone.  We can’t dismiss this as a misstep.  The Godfather is an apt title for the role it plays in governing the crime genre, and it would take some newly discovered marvel, who works with celluloid just as well as Liberace works with ivories, to direct a film that doesn’t take anything from that criterion.  And I’m not saying that F.F. Coppola handed down everything down to Scorsese for this 1990 work.  After all, the picture still remains his chef d’oeuvre, alongside such unforgettable earlier work as Raging Bull and Alice Doesn’t Live Here Anymore.

Read more…

Troll 2

Bottom Line: Truly classic B-movie.

“They’re eating her! And then they’re going to eat me! Oh my Goooooooood!” –Darren Ewing as Arnold

Directed by: Claudio “Drake Floyd” Fragasso
Starring: Connie McFarland, Darren Ewing, David McConnell, Deborah Reed, George Hardy, Jason Steadman, Jason Wright, Margo Prey, Michael Stephenson, Robert Ormsby

When it comes to movies that are conscious of how awful they are, I strongly believe in a very thin line that separates those that are so bad they’re good, and those that are just plain terrible. Whereas PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE is often considered the “King of the Z-Movie” for its ability to sufficiently entertain despite being terrible in every possible respect, CHILD’S PLAY and JAWS: THE REVENGE don’t go far enough over the top to achieve an adequate level of entertainment. That line–though very thin–is perfectly straddled by TROLL 2. It’s like watching a group of professionals (CHILD’S PLAY and JAWS: THE REVENGE) struggle over a barely fraying tightrope, and later on seeing a mere amateur (TROLL 2) flawlessly cross the distance between two buildings on a line of thread. I mean, I’m not saying the film is flawless. Quite frankly, it’s a ninety-five-minute flaw that takes liberty in creating its own apocalyptic clichés rather than relying on others to keep the story going. Sometimes when I watch terrible films, I tend to wonder how they are so meticulously entertaining, but not here. Plain and simple, it’s not the story that fluently progresses the film, but rather the rampant flaws that are so excessive, they could gather into a story of their own.

Read more…

The Godfather Part III

Bottom Line: A virtually insignificant conclusion to the saga.

Directed by: Francis Ford Coppola
Starring: Al Pacino, Andy Garcia, Bridget Fonda, Diane Keaton, Ellie Wallach, George Hamilton, Joe Mantegna, Raf Vallone, Sofia Coppola, Talia Shire

After two incontrovertibly classic crime films, THE GODFATHER PART III is a major disappointment, heavily plagued by the “threequel effect”. I’m referring to the syndrome that left marks on films such BACK TO THE FUTURE: PART III, DIE HARD: WITH A VENGEANCE, BATMAN FOREVER, and PSYCHO III. Out of all those, though, this film must be the biggest drop in its series. In the simplest of terms, this third entry transforms what was previously a heavy-headed crime drama with touches of family, into a lighthearted family drama with touches of crime.

Read more…

Die Hard 2: Die Harder

Bottom Line: Something suspiciously similar to watching the first one again. A bit “hard” to comprehend.

Directed by: Renny Harlin
Starring: Bonnie Bedelia, Bruce Willis, William Atherton

Sequel to 1988 classic returns with John McClane (Bruce Willis), a New York cop and our story’s hero. It’s Christmas Eve again, and he is waiting for his wife in the Washington Dulles International Airport. When a group of terrorists begin to take over the airport and everyone inside it, he must take action.

Read more…

Dances with Wolves

Bottom Line: Picked up a few unnecessary Oscars, but good enough.

Directed by: Kevin Costner
Starring: Graham Greene, Kevin Costner, Mary McDonnell

Oscar-winning historical epic is intriguing but often slow. Set around the period of the American Civil War, this film tells the story of Lieutenant Dunbar (Kevin Costner), a soldier who becomes a war hero upon leading the Union into victory. He then leaves for a remote area in Dakota territory, but soon realizes it is only inhabited by a wolf whom he names Two-Socks and a native tribe called the Sioux. Lt. Dunbar gradually befriends the tribe and even falls in love with one of its members.

Read more…

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 764 other followers

%d bloggers like this: