Cinemaniac Reviews

OLD. NEW. GOOD. BAD. EVERYTHING.

Archive for the tag “1999”

Wild Wild West

Day Five of the Two-Week Torturefest

As lame as that horse Mongo punched in the face in “Blazing Saddles”.

www

Directed by: Barry Sonnenfeld
Written by: S.S. Wilson and Brent Maddock & Jeffrey Price and Peter S. Seaman
Based on: “The Wild Wild West” (1965-1969 TV series)
Captain James West: Will Smith
U.S. Marshal Artemus Gordon: Kevin Kline
Ulysses S. Grant: Kevin Kline
Dr. Arliss Loveless: Kenneth Branagh
Rita Escobar: Salma Hayek
Also Starring: Bai Ling, Frederique van der Wal, M. Emmet Walsh, Musetta Vander, Sofia Eng, Ted Levine

Distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures on June 30, 1999. Produced in English by the United States. Runs 107 minutes. Rated PG-13 by the MPAA–western violence, sexual situations, infrequent/brief nudity.

Wild Wild West was watched on Sunday, December 23, 2012.

“Too many people spend money they haven’t earned to buy things they don’t want to impress people they don’t like.” –Will Smith
THE IMPLICATION: “Wild Wild West cost a hundred seventy million to make. Director didn’t like it, so instead of revising it, he released it to theaters, tortured theatergoers that way, and earned a profit.”

Poor Will Smith! He’s an increasingly talented actor, regardless of what genre is at hand. I have yet to see him fail, but on several occasions, he has been sorely miscast.

Wild Wild West is not such a case. Yes, Smith is the standout in this otherwise un-watchable film, especially for a role he, himself, picked out. He was initially offered the role of Neo in The Matrix, but turned that film—now considered a modern classic—down for a rather insulting rendition of classic television. Considering that, I guess Wild Wild West does offer one mildly genuine surprise: it didn’t liquidate Smith’s career.

In most cases, it’s pretty bad when a movie wants to be completely serious and ends up failing miserably. There’s essentially only one worse concept: a film that masquerades as a “comedy,” yet the few gags that evoke the most nervous of laughter are thanks to pure luck.

All too many times, Wild Wild West has the strange, pretentious idea that it is playing out humorously. One-liners, double entendres, puns, and sight gags are shot left and right in this highly forgettable excuse for a “steampunk western.” But the film’s frame of mind is so self-confident, it’s a wonder none of the four writers ever came to realize their script was only firing blanks. Occasionally, there’s a goofy joke that manages to crack a smile. But halfway through, the film has worn itself so abusively thin, gunfire has been used more frequently as a wakeup call.

Wild Wild West bears not one kind regard to the art of subtlety. It’s an overly straightforward, loudly exaggerated, completely recycled landfill protruding with tiresome anachronisms. To call this Mission: Impossible meets Blazing Saddles would be one of the most unlawful offenses one could ever commit at the expense of either film. During the 19th century, two men are sent by President Grant to track down a criminal from New Orleans. Something—perhaps everything—about that premise reeks in a lack of originality. Director Barry Sonnenfeld has baked a turducken, but he has forgotten both the chicken and the duck. Wild Wild West is a turkey.

Footnote: With regard to the “Bottom-of-the-Barrel Line,” I’m not sure if the horse in Blazing Saddles was lame. On the other hand, my eleven-year-old sister LOVES horses to death, so I’ll make an effort to have her leave a comment either affirming or negating that speculation.

D

Crossroads – it’s Britney, b__ch, and she’s valedictorian.

This review was brought to you by…
TWTF

American Beauty

Review No. 382

american_beauty

The Bottom Line: One of the best comedy-dramas ever made.

Directed by: Sam Mendes
Written by: Alan Ball
Lester Burnham: Kevin Spacey
Carolyn Burnham: Annette Bening
Jane Burnham: Thora Birch
Angela Hayes: Mena Suvari
Also Starring: Allison Janney, Barry Del Sherman, Chris Cooper, Peter Gallagher, Sam Robards, Scott Bakula, Wes Bentley

Distributed by DreamWorks Pictures on September 17, 1999. Produced in English by the United States. Runs 122 minutes. Rated R by the MPAA for strong sexuality, language, violence and drug content.

American Beauty was watched on December 31, 2012.

“It’s a great thing when you realize you still have the ability to surprise yourself. Makes you wonder what else you can do that you’ve forgotten about.” –Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey)

American Beauty is a bleak, somewhat demented drama, ignited by its appropriated black comedy. It’s a spectrum of love and hate—often intertwined—but it’s difficult not to love. A pessimist would love it even more, undoubtedly finding a full connection with the protagonist.

Our story seems a bit twisted, but it’s only the characters who twist themselves, as well as each other. Essentially, this is a kaleidoscopic vision of an ordinary neighborhood, played in a key that gives it a different, deeper meaning. It’s about a “mid-life crisis,” but not an ordinary one. Because ordinary is boring, as is pointed out here multiple times.

Lester Burnham (Kevin Spacey) is not what you’d imagine of a married man. He’s lonely, bored, depressed. He hates his wife, a happy-go-lucky prima donna. He disregards his daughter. And one day, his life changes altogether when he falls in love with his daughter’s best friend, Angela. What’s worse, he’s infatuated with the very thought of her. He overhears her discussing his muscles, so he decides to work out. He notices she smokes marijuana, so he spends $2,000 on drugs from the next door neighbor. Soon after, he experiences a sudden precognition of his own death…and decides to take advantage of his obsession.

My own spirit was what brought me to American Beauty. The past month of my life (save for the past three or four days) has been devoted to insomnia, pessimism, etc. Having watched it during this state, I found the characters very authentic. But even with a climbing sense of optimism, I still feel as strongly about the characters and story as I did upon initial viewing.

Without a doubt, the film is absurd and just slightly exaggerated. It’s difficult to admit any sort of connection with the entire piece itself, but Lester Burnham seemed, in a great sense, familiar; yet new in the grand scheme of things. He defines the entire spectrum of pessimism very sarcastically, but essentially, he accomplishes what optimism aims for. Halfway through the film, Spacey gives his umpteenth narration. “Remember those posters that said, ‘Today is the first day of the rest of your life’?” he asks us. “Well, that’s true of every day but one: the day you die.” How truly thought-provoking, yet at the same time, funny. The entire film is a wild hoot, one that constantly makes each scene into another apex.

American Beauty is absolutely beautiful. It’s a multiple-choice test, similar to a Rorschach test, but there is a correct answer:

Is it…

a) the story of a man who thinks he’s going to be shot, so in his last few days on Earth, he decides to replenish his adolescence, rather than reminisce about it?

Or is it…

b) the story of how a man’s obsession detracts from the love and support he had previously devoted to his family and career, and increased his self-esteem by a matter of self-indulgence?

The correct answer is:

“It’s a film that opens up as a), but uses that setup as a mere façade in order to disclose b).”

American Beauty is no less than extraordinary. There is a very small handful of films that are just as unique, and an even smaller handful that draws any similarity with it.

This is a film that shows equal imperfection in all characters. Lester is the protagonist, but only by the laws of storytelling. He narrates the film, appears most prominently, and makes the changes that culminate in a denouement—an unusual one that would play out as a tragedy, were it the conclusion of any other film. There are neither one nor ten antagonists, and just like all the other characters, Lester is essentially an anti-hero. No one acts honorably in American Beauty to achieve their equally lousy targets. Lester is an unfaithful husband, even bringing his lust to a mutual attraction with a girl less than half his age (among other things). Carolyn, his wife, has led to his depression by socializing with everyone she sees, while not saying a word to him (among other things). Jane, their teenage daughter, takes every action by matter of sheer impulse, whether she’s around her boyfriend, her father, or even on videotape (among other things). It doesn’t end until you’ve reached the last character named in the credits.

American Beauty represents the multiplying flaws of humanity in a highly accessible light. It’s everywhere in life, because no one lives in a “bed of roses,” or even a “bathtub of roses.” Except Angela as she appeared in Lester’s mind.

A PLUS

Fight Club

Bottom Line: Stylish, preposterously original black comedy.

Directed by: David Fincher
Starring: Brad Pitt, Christina Cabot, David Andrews, Edward Norton, Eugenie Bondurant, George Maguire Helena Bonham Carter, Meat Loaf Aday, Richmond Arquette, Zach Grenier

1st RULE: You do not talk about Fight Club.
2nd RULE: You DO NOT talk about Fight Club.
3rd RULE: If someone says “stop” or goes limp, taps out the fight is over.
4th RULE: Only two guys to a fight.
5th RULE: One fight at a time.
6th RULE: No shirts, no shoes.
7th RULE: Fights will go on as long as they have to.
8th RULE: If this is your first night at Fight Club, you HAVE to fight.

By definition, I’ve already headed myself in the direction of heavily fracturing the first and second “rules of Fight Club”, as famously spoken by actor Brad Pitt as Tyler Darden. But what do I care? Moreover, why should I care? In the modern age, especially, we could take a walk around any given city and perhaps spot out a couple hundred people whom present themselves as reminders of the psychosocial, nihilistic main character. If there was one person living on this earth who had a story this bizarre to tell–and actually lived to tell it–I’d actually be a bit more scared than impressed. Fight Club opens with a following of a bored, stressed man (Edward Norton) who would give anything to be just about anyone at a higher status than him. He works at an office by day, and by night, he spends his spare time in a necrophobic state, attending group therapy for just about every imaginable disease that he doesn’t have–only to find himself back at home losing another night of sleep to his chronic state of insomnia. Everything changes when this man, whose name beyond “Narrator” is not once revealed, meets Tyler Durden (Brad Pitt) on an airplane he has boarded for a business trip. The word “carefree” in no way begins to describe Tyler; “reckless” is only slightly better. It’s fairly ironic that even though he works as a retailer for soap bars, his lifestyle, domicile, and speech are all filthy in their own rights. To look up to someone as disgusting as Tyler would dig our Narrator, whose condominium has now been burned down, out of his almost bottomless pit. After being taken under Tyler’s wing, and into his dilapidated house, he is hesitantly brought into a world of reckless behavior, self-destruction, ignorance, and–above all–the co-foundation of Fight Club.

Read more…

Following

Bottom Line: An overlooked debut from the director of The Dark Knight.

Directed by: Christopher Nolan
Starring: Alex Haw, Darren Ormandy, Dick Bradsell, Gillian El-Kadi, Jennifer Angel, Jeremy Theobald, John Nolan, Lucy Russell, Nicolas Carlotti

Now that countless unforgettable names such as Alfred Hitchcock and Stanley Kubrick are no longer alive to produce modern classics, and several others such as Rob Reiner and Tim Burton have foreshadowed–if not confirmed–a significant drop in their careers, we’re left with only a handful or two of filmmakers that we can consistently rely on to direct just as successfully as when they had just begun. Christopher Nolan is one of such figures. Nolan always enjoys experimenting with his cinematic techniques and presenting them far less traditionally, but I have yet to witness a resulting failure. Although the vast majority of his films have been widely praised and recognized (i.e. Inception, The Dark Knight), it seems rather disappointing that 1999′s Following–his debut film, nonetheless–is by far his most overlooked.

Read more…

Double Jeopardy

Bottom Line: An interesting plot wrapped up in a silly, unrealistic mess.

Directed by: Bruce Beresford
Starring: Annabeth Gish, Ashley Judd, Bruce Greenwood, Davenia McFadden, Gillian Barber, Jay Brazeau, Roma Maffia, Spencer Clark, Tommy Lee Jones

It’s rare for me to find myself so convinced that one person’s trash actually is another person’s treasure.  I can, quite honestly, envision enjoying DOUBLE JEOPARDY.  Had this plot been scripted by a mastermind in the crime genre and directed by someone of the Martin Scorsese caliber, it would have soared.  Albeit intriguing, I’m not one to overlook cornball dialogue, poor acting, severe lack of reality, and the employment of just about every cliché in the book–as far as crime thrillers–when I sit myself down in front of such movies.  Trash?  Not quite, but certainly trashy.  Treasure?  Uhh, no.

Read more…

Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me

Bottom Line: Surprisingly (or unsurprisingly) hilarious; accurately made spoof.

“Yea, baby! Yeah!” —Mike Myers as Austin Powers

Directed by: Jay Roach
Starring: Heather Graham, Michael York, Mike Myers

Witty, original spy parody (specifically of earlier James Bond films) is the comical, flashy tale of Austin Powers (Mike Myers) and his “shag-adelic” girlfriend, Felicity Shagwell (Heather Graham). When Dr. Evil (Myers, again) steals his “mojo”, he must do anything to regain it. The film gains much of its humor from poking fun at the 007 films from around the 1960s–whether it be from using risqué Bond girl-type names, or from exaggerating on the corniness of the villains.

Read more…

The Rage: Carrie 2

Bottom Line: Irrelevant to the classic, a good one for even Carrie fans to skip.

Directed by: Katt Shea
Starring: Dylan Bruno, Emily Bergl, Jason London

It’s no wonder fans of the 1976 Stephen King movie CARRIE are scratching there heads about this film. Besides the fact that Rachel Lang is supposedly Carrie White’s half-sister; and Sue Snell, one of the main bullies in the original film, has now ironically become the school’s guidance counselor (still portrayed by Amy Irving); THE RAGE virtually has nothing in common with CARRIE. In fact, the title is very misleading. If this were to be even remotely better, somebody could have simply suggested changing the title to something like, “Rachel: The Rage”, and billing it as “the follow-up to CARRIE.”

Read more…

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 768 other followers

%d bloggers like this: