Cinemaniac Reviews

Give five minutes. Save two hours.

Archive for the tag “2004”

Speak

Review No. 481

The more it does “Speak”, the more powerful it becomes.

speak-2004_poster

A-MINUS

DIRECTED BY JESSICA SHARZER. PRODUCED BY SHARZER, FRED BERNER, MATTHEW MYERS, AND ANNIE YOUNG FRISBIE.  SCREENPLAY BY SHARZER AND FRISBIE. BASED ON THE NOVEL BY LAURIE HALSE ANDERSON. STARRING KRISTEN STEWART (MELINDA SORDINO), MICHAEL ANGARANO (DAVE PETRAKIS), ROBERT JOHN BURKE (MR. NECK), ERIC LIVELY (ANDY EVANS), ELIZABETH PERKINS (JOYCE SORDINO), D. B. SWEENEY (JACK SORDINO), AND STEVE ZAHN (MR. FREEMAN). ALSO STARRING HALLEE HIRSH, TONY ROSEBORO, AND ALLISON SIKO. DISTRIBUTED BY SHOWTIME NETWORKS, INC. ON JANUARY 20, 2004. PRODUCED IN ENGLISH BY THE UNITED STATES. RUNS 1 HOUR, 32 MINUTES. RATED PG-13 BY THE MPAA, FOR MATURE THEMATIC MATERIAL INVOLVING A TEEN RAPE.

SPEAK WAS WATCHED ON MAY 18, 2013.

“I have never heard a more eloquent silence.” –Speak by Laurie Halse Anderson

On the outside, it’s embracing the clichés of a teen drama ever so obliviously. Our characters are merely Hollywood high schoolers. We have the insecure, bitchy, blonde girls who have nothing better to do than gossip. The annoying kid who we realize is neglected, but we also realize it’s probably because he/she just doesn’t shut up. The guy that doesn’t seem like anything special to the protagonist, but seems cuter to her as the story progresses. The parents who just couldn’t care much less what’s going on in their daughter’s life. But as the story moves on, these one-dimensional caricatures rise up as three-dimensional…well, people, and for that matter, ordinary people.

Speaking of ordinary people, Speak is a lot like 1980′s Ordinary People, and when Speak speaks, it speaks a powerful tale. We begin after the horrifying events that turned an outgoing girl like Melinda Sordino (Kristen Stewart) into the shy girl who, in her buried state, decides to stop speaking and notices a certain beauty that cannot be expressed by words. Melinda was raped the summer before she entered her freshman year. She was at a party, and when she dialed 9-1-1, she was far too shocked to report the incident. When the cops arrived, she was still more traumatized then ever, and she was, thus, labelled a “squealer” by everyone at the party.

Speak-Movie-kristen-stewart-7224267-960-540

Symbolism?

Melinda experiences numerous flashbacks to the incident during the course of the film. Yet she can’t admit to anyone that she was raped, and she’s desperately trying to convince herself that she wasn’t. She decides that she can’t live her life hell-bent on lying to herself and blinding everyone around her from the truth. When her parents notice her grades dropping significantly, they seek help for her. Now Melinda must find a way to rub away her scars, rather than pretend she can’t feel them.

Speak features Kristen Stewart in a tour de force role. In so-called “efforts” such as Twilight and Snow White and the Huntsman, Kristen barely acts. Her monotonous, melancholy facial expressions, rapid-fire verbal delivery, and insomniac build have earned her much negativity in recent years. Yet all this seems to fit in this earlier drama. She makes the role of a disturbed teenager seem easy to portray, and it’s not. She always looks depressed. When she does speak, it’s generally in quick, broken stutters. What makes her twenty-three-year-old self look sleepless, made her thirteen-year-old self look miserable. Even her nervous breakdowns can be difficult to watch, simply because they’re performed well.

Speak isn’t a movie one watches over and over.  Its disappearance into the “TV movie” nomenclature–despite a premiere at the Sundance Film Festival over a year and a half prior–leads me to believe that the movie never got the love it deserves.  As previously mentioned, it does build off sheer caricatures.  But it also builds those into a poignant, gripping slice of life.  I may have teared up near the end, but I was too focused on Melinda to worry over my own matters.

Star Trek Into Darkness

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban

Review No. 407

harry_potter_and_the_prisoner_of_azkaban_ver3

The Bottom Line: The best of the series.

Directed by: Alfonso Cuarón
Screenplay by: Steve Kloves
Based on: “Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban” by J.K. Rowling
Harry Potter: Daniel Radcliffe
Ron Weasley: Rupert Grint
Hermione Granger: Emma Watson
Rubeus Hagrid: Robbie Coltrane
Albus Dumbledore: Michael Gambon
Severus Snape: Alan Rickman
Draco Malfoy: Tom Felton
Minerva McGonagall: Maggie Smith
Remus Lupin: David Thewlis
Sirius Black: Gary Oldman
Also Starring: Emma Thompson, Fiona Shaw, Julie Walters, Richard Griffiths, Timothy Spall

Distributed by Warner Bros. Pictures on May 31, 2004. Produced in English by the United Kingdom and the United States. Runs 142 mins. Rated PG by the MPAA for frightening moments, creature violence and mild language.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban was watched on January 29, 2013.

“Why would I go looking for somebody who wants to kill me?” –Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe)

As I gave Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban the next in an unending string of countless watches, I began to wonder whether or not I was being a bit partial to director Chris Columbus’s work on the first two. I am somewhat of a fan of his, after all. I began to wonder whether or not my review was overstating a subpar effort, whether I was giving him a run for the money out of nothing but a sense of bias.

Now, as I write my review, I realize this is completely untrue. Columbus did a fair job on bringing J.K. Rowling’s two forefront novels to the silver screen. His style is family-oriented, making him a great choice, plus he was able to direct in both a childlike and meaningful manner. I realize this only because of Alfonso Cuarón’s superb continuation per the series’ third entry. This is the turning point, the time when the giddiness of the first two needs to disappear. I wouldn’t say a better director was needed (especially since I, unfortunately, cannot recall having seen any of Cuarón’s other films), but I would see a new director was needed.

It appears Cuarón was the perfect choice. The same screenwriter (Steve Kloves) is here, as is the same cast (with a few notable additions). But the series feels much different, and that’s actually fantastic. Prisoner of Azkaban was shot by a different cinematographer, and thus in a different tone. John Williams returns—for his final time on the series—but his music is much more subtle, much of it limited to nothing more than a harpsichord or a flute. The combined effort is very eerie and dark, and I assume that’s exactly what J.K. Rowling had desired of this entry.

It took me a few viewings before I noticed that Prisoner of Azkaban is the first and only installment in which Harry does not encounter Voldemort (the sorcerer responsible for his parents’ death) directly. There’s a reason for this. It’s written out on paper well enough by Rowling. How Cuarón tackles it is phenomenal. This is no longer a “wow factor”, exuberantly high fantasy. It’s a character drama that embraces the Gothic nature of the saga. There’s much that goes into taking mythology (as the first outwardly did; the second more inwardly) and twisting it into a striking fable with something of a cliffhanger ending. All this is readied with the climactic moments. I must have been in the first or second grade when I initially saw the movie, and I got the same “adrenaline rush-cum-shivers down the spine” feeling that I got when I first watched The Silence of the Lambs or A Nightmare on Elm Street (both of those two at a much older age, of course). When I re-watched Prisoner of Azkaban recently, I seemed to re-experience at least 50% of that sensation, and that’s still an insurmountable compliment.

The film also embraces Harry’s transition into adolescence, from the very beginning in his “unwanted home” environment, to the heartfelt moments at the very end. Unless you were feeding your inner child, you just can’t tear up in Sorcerer’s Stone or Chamber of Secrets. It’s all too easy in Prisoner of Azkaban. Daniel Radcliffe was fifteen years old when he played the thirteen-year-old Harry Potter here. He looks it and sounds it. But we wouldn’t understand the angst of Harry if it were clear he had just come to fit the term “teenager.” Would we?

I fear that if I give any of the story away, I may run the risk of saying too much without knowing I’ve said anything at all. It happens quite a lot when discussing something you feel so strongly about, and yes, I do love this canon, especially this very piece. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a film that truly delves deep into Harry’s past, then intertwines it poignantly with his present. You wouldn’t expect a story that started out as nothing more than “hocus pocus” to be this deep, would you? Maybe that’s a bit of exaggeration, but the effort (and where it lands) is truly mind-blowing. We learn much about Harry’s family, and that much of the Hogwarts staff—including the new Defense Against the Dark Arts teacher—knew his parents as well as him- or herself.

Subtleties, foreshadowing, etc. All of J.K. Rowling’s literary genius is preserved here. If you can come close to predicting any of it, you’ve either seen it before or read the book. (Or both.) Kloves’s screenplay offers quite a bit of emotion here. Either it was botched in the first two films, or it was edited to the extremes here. Once we’re given characters to care boundlessly about, Harry’s shoes to walk in for a couple hours, all the magic is completely involving. It’s a you-are-there drama, even when you realize that it’s all as probable as the fantasy it truly is.

A PLUS

The King’s Speech

Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy

Review No. 398

NOTE: Anchorman was edited from its original R rating in order to earn a PG-13. Incidentally, the “unrated” version–which would have been the R-rated one–contains scenes that are just as unfunny, if not even worse, all in the name of being crass. But that, my friend, is Will Ferrell for you–at his very worst.

anchorman_ver2

The Bottom Line: Sign off before Anchorman signs on.

Directed by: Adam McKay
Written by: Will Ferrell and Adam McKay
Narrated by: Bill Kurtis
Ron Burgundy: Will Ferrell
Also Starring: Christina Applegate, David Koechner, Fred Willard, Paul Rudd, Steve Carell

Distributed by DreamWorks Pictures on July 9, 2004. Produced in English by the United States. Runs 95 mins. Rated PG-13 on appeal by the MPAA for sexual humor, language and comic violence. Reviewed cut released unrated at 103 mins.

Anchorman was watched on January 22, 2013.

“Based on actual events. Only the people, places and events have been changed. –opening title card”

(…and so ends this outrageous sense of humor…)

Poor Christina Applegate! She’s so beautiful, smart, and funny, but the jokes are all on her in Anchorman: The Legend of Ron Burgundy. Why? Apparently, it’s because she’s a woman. You may think, Why does gender matter? Quite frankly, it doesn’t, but only after an hour and a half of tortured attempts at humor does Will Ferrell learn this.

I won’t discredit Anchorman for being offensively unrealistic. This not only stars Will Ferrell, he co-wrote it. Ferrell never wants his comedy to make sense. He just wants us to laugh. Often times, his career has shown success at this. Others, he comes off at downright obnoxious.

Anchorman depicts a relationship between Will Ferrell and Christina Applegate, in hopes that you can believe the two of them together. I feel like as I watched the film, my thoughts wouldn’t cease to parallel Applegate’s:

Good gracious, why won’t he shut up? Is he trying to offend me, or is he trying to offend someone else, whilst looking me in the eyes? All right, I’ll hit pause–no wait, did he just say something clever? I may as well stand by.

Anchorman is Will Ferrell’s Network wannabe. This half-baked poke, however, trades the witty political satire for crass, gratuitous sex jokes. Half the time, it’s like listening to a six-year-old try and repeat whatever he hears on TV. No, Mr. Ferrell, that’s NOT what San Diego means, and if you had just taken the time to Google it, your would have realized that your co-anchor is, in fact, correct.

But if you do want something that’ll make you as mad as hell, please watch Anchorman. There are a few bright spots. Sometimes you can feel better knowing that a few talented faces can waste their time making a film watchable. Ben Stiller, Paul Rudd, Steve Carell, and the dog who knows Spanish fluently. They’re the real comic reliefs here.

Critiquing from the blogosphere, I’m the Cinemaniac, and thanks for stopping by.

C

Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind

Bottom Line: Heartwarming.  Heartbreaking.  Mesmerizing.

Directed by: Michel Gondry
Starring: Elijah Wood, Jim Carrey, Kate Winslet, Kirsten Dunst, Mark Ruffalo, Tom Wilkinson

“How happy is the blameless vestal’s lot!
The world forgetting, by the world forgot.
Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind!
Each pray’r accepted, and each wish resign’d…”
–”Eloisa to Abelard”, lines 207-210, by Alexander Pope

Charlie Kaufman is a genius, one of few remaining screenwriters who can structure a film like prose amid the utter beauty of a poem.  Only on the rarest of occasions does Kaufman write in an accessible nature, so to speak, but the mesmerizing atmosphere that has been constructed not only holds our undivided attention for as long as it pleases, it also demands further viewings.  Not to decipher, but to enjoy the glorious experience once more.  Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a brave feat deserving of insurmountable praise.  We’d generally scoff at a cross between the romance and science fiction genres.  It seems like a novel idea for those longing to revisit the golden age of B-movies.  But Kaufman can, quite simply, do anything, even make an audience tear up at the end of his romantic sci-fi film.

Read more…

Ray

NOTE: This review regards the extended version, which is nearly three hours long, but well worth the time if you truly care about the subject matter.

Bottom Line: A moving biography that flies by in three hours.

Directed by: Taylor Hackford
Starring: Aunjanue Ellis, Bokeem Woodbine, C.J. Sanders, Clifton Powell, Curtis Armstrong, Harry Lennix, Jamie Foxx, Kerry Washington, Regina King, Sharon Warren

It’s weird. I always get the most pleasurable feelings listening to music produced by drug addicted performers. Don’t ask me why: I haven’t quite found an established reason for this idiosyncracy. Perhaps it’s because the quality of the music, the tone, and the mood seem to strike a deep chord inside my soul. Again, that’s just an assumption, so I may be wrong and it may have something to do with me being absolutely psychotic. Of all these “trippy” singers–save for the Beatles and Nirvana–Ray Charles is the one whose work I cherish the most. Oddly enough, I wouldn’t be saying that statement so firmly before watching Jamie Foxx perform fabulously against a pitch-perfect screenplay in RAY.

Read more…

Mean Girls

image

Bottom Line: It’s definitely not what you’d think it is.

Directed by: Mark Waters
Starring: Amanda Seyfried, Amy Poehler, Daniel Franzese, Jonathan Bennett, Lacey Chabert, Lindsay Lohan, Lizzy Caplan, Neil Flynn, Rachel McAdams, Tina Fey

If films were thunderstorms, MEAN GIRLS struck me like a bolt too large and blinding to see. If films were telephones, it was one loud, demanding wake up call. If films were rainbows, it was the mythical pot of gold I had always been told about but never even flinched to believe. You get the picture. What I was expecting was a sassy, girly comedy. Yes, it did tend to be both those. But when someone like former SNL star Tina Fey writes the film, it takes off as a side-splittingly funny, slightly offbeat show of color, cat fights, and crazy characters.

Read more…

Catwoman

image

Bottom Line: Bad kitty! This is the kind of stuff you’re supposed to do in your litter box!

“Oh, my bad!” –Halle Berry as Catwoman

Directed by: Pitof
Starring: Benjamin Bratt, Halle Berry, Sharon Stone

Unintentionally ameowsing BATMAN spinoff narrates about Patience Phillips (Halle Berry), a designer for beauty product ads. Upon being caught snooping around a production factory and listening in on plans, she is murdered when her despicable boss’s wife flushes out the pipes through which she is trying to escape. Outside, she is revived by Midnight, an Egyptian Mau kitty who visited her home and had an inherited ability to predict her death. With her new nine lives, Patience becomes a “catwoman” (a term which, according to the film, traces back to Ancient Egypt, not Bob Kane) and seeks revenge on her killer.

Read more…

The Passion of the Christ

Bottom Line: If you’re a “passionate” Christian, watch it immediately. Otherwise, skip it.

[in Aramaic] “Father, into your hands…I commend my spirit.” –Jim Caviazel as Jesus Christ

Directed by: Mel Gibson
Starring: Jim Caviezel, Maia Morgenstern, Monica Bellucci

This film has left me speechless, unsure of where to begin, so I’ll start off the review by quoting Roger Ebert, perhaps the most respected critic of today’s world. His review contains a postscript, part of which reads: “I said the film is the most violent I have ever seen. … The MPAA’s R rating is definitive proof that the organization either will never give the NC-17 rating for violence alone, or was intimidated by the subject matter.” Never before have I found the words of any film critic more agreeable. The MPAA gave this an R certificate “for sequences of graphic violence.” That alone sounds terribly harsh, but it’s not enough. I can’t picture from any angle why on Earth the MPAA would give this an R rating; it is near-constant torture. My best guess would be because of marketing purposes. Had this been rated NC-17, not nearly as many people would have gone to see it; not nearly as many people would have experienced Mel Gibson’s horrendously poignant film adaptation of the Gospel. Ironically, it is the highest-grossing R-rated film to date.

Read more…

Saw

Bottom Line: Not appreciated enough for its newness…I can’t believe I just “saw” this!

“I want to play a game.” –Tobin Bell as Jigsaw

Directed by: James Wan
Starring: Cary Elwes, Danny Glover, Leigh Whannell

Interesting story about Lawrence (Cary Elwes) and Adam (Leigh Whannell), two men who wake up in a room together, unaware of how they got there. They are each chained to a wall on opposite ends of the chamber with audio tapes bearing each of their names, and in between them is a dead man with a tape recorder in his hand. Upon playing the recordings, they come to know that they have been put there by a serial killer nicknamed “Jigsaw” (Tobin Bell), and that they have one hour to strategically free themselves. Meanwhile, there is a police investigation in progress regarding the killer.

Read more…

The Aviator

Bottom Line: Worthy, captivating, and never boring; Leo at some of his best.

“The way of the future.” –Leonardo DiCaprio as Howard Hughes

Directed by: Martin Scorsese
Starring: Cate Blanchett, Kate Beckinsale, Leonardo DiCaprio

Dazzling Scorsese biopic captures the career Howard Hughes (Leonardo DiCaprio), a billionaire, a filmmaker, a philanthropist, an investor, an engineer, a lunatic, and (of course) an aviator. Within a mind-blowing three hours, everything among his various efforts are documented, starting with his cinematic breakthrough as a controversial director in the early 1930s.

Read more…

Post Navigation

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 792 other followers

%d bloggers like this: